Fuel tuners defeat rev-limiter
program
Words and photos by Jeff Burk
8/24/05
t's
a good bet that the first phone call Ray Alley made the Monday
morning after Alan Johnson and Tony Schumacher stunned the
drag racing community with an unreal 4.44/337 lap at Brainerd
International Raceway -- a track that has yielded only one
nitro record in its history prior to that pass -- was to the
engineers at MSD in El Paso, TX.
The much ballyhooed rev-limiter/timing retard device that
MSD had developed at the direction of NHRA which had performed
flawlessly up to this point apparently had been circumvented
by the at least one nitro racer. You can be sure that Alley
wanted the MSD folks to reprogram the device to reduce the
maximum rpm the engine could turn and to take even more timing
out of the engine.
MSD was more than willing to do anything that
the NHRA tech department asked, so they put together a team
and went to Memphis to reprogram all of the devices on Top
Fuel and Funny Cars to meet with the NHRA mandate that the
changes be made before the upcoming U.S. Nationals.
What Alley told MSD to do was to reprogram the rev-limiter/timing
retard device so that instead of monitoring engine rpm four
seconds after a wide open throttle switch activated it, now
the engine rpm would be monitored after 3.8 seconds after
WOT. Additionally, instead of being programmed to take timing
away from the engine at the rate of 50 degrees per second,
the device now would take timing away at the rate of 100 degrees
per second.
In addition the trigger rpm of 8400 would be reduced to 8300.
The nominal amount of timing taken out of the engine is approximately
25 degrees in a couple tenths of a second, which will slow
down both the engine and tire speed instantly.
In a perfect world MSD's rev-limiter device would do just
what Alley and NHRA intended it to do: keep speeds below 335
mph. Unfortunately for the NHRA and their Director of Top
Fuel and Funny Car Racing, this isn't a perfect world. What
they obviously didn't know was that apparently Alan Johnson
may have figured out how to render the rev-limiter ineffective
and even use it to his advantage to go faster.
At Memphis several teams showed me at least two ways they
could make the rev-limiter completely ineffective. The first
was to put a one-second time delay on the wide open throttle
switch that activates the retard device. Since most of the
cars use air-activated switches, this was an easy engineering
job. What that accomplishes is to change the instant on the
lap timeline when the box started looking for engine rpm above
8300 rpm from 3.8 seconds to 4.8 seconds into the lap. In
reality the device has no effect on a car making a 4.5-second
lap. On a Funny Car they are probably putting in a 1.3-second
delay.
Joe Pando (foreground) and Doug Waits,
Programming Engineer (background)
|