Our Mission
DRAG RACING Online will be published monthly with new stories and features. Some columns will be updated throughout the month.
DRAG RACING Online
owes allegiance to no sanctioning body and will call 'em like we see 'em. We strive for truth, integrity, irreverence, and the betterment of drag racing. We have no agenda other than providing the drag racing public with unbiased information and view points they can't get in any other drag racing publication.


Staff
Editor/Publisher
Jeff Burk
Editor at Large
Chris Martin
Senior Editor
Ian Tocher
Bracket Racing
Editor
Jok Nicholson
Nostalgia Editor
Jeff Utterback
Senior Staff Writer

Susan Wade

Senior Staff
Photographer
Ron Lewis
Contributing
Columnists

Jeff Leonard
Darr Hawthorne
Dale Wilson
Chris Martin
Tim Marshall

Photographers
Jeff Burk
Adam Cranmer
Steve Gruenwald
Zak Hawthorne
Ian Tocher
Todd Dziadosz
Bryan Ellis
Tim Marshall
Tech Contributors

Mike Stewart
Scott Walker
Jim Salemi
Dave Koehler
Darren Mayer
Wayne Scraba

National Advertising
Director
Darr Hawthorne
818-906-8222
Fax: 990-7422
Production Manager
Kay Burk
Managing Editor
Alyssa Stahr
Accounts Manager
Casey Araiza

POWERED BY:

Head Web Wrench
Nathan Williams
Webmaster /
Lead Designer
Matt Schramel
Starpixel.com

7/9/04

Marketing Drag Racing

'm of the opinion that mainstream stick and ball spectators and media have little time for professional drag racing unless something significant barrier is broken or there is a spectacular accident. I think the media frenzy after the Darrell Russell crash proves that.

During what I consider to be modern drag racing's golden era of growth, the drama of the race to the 300-mph barrier, the first 200-mph doorslammer pass or the race to the four-second elapsed time brought increased spectators, followed by new sponsors, better and bigger tracks, and better television.

We are not likely to see the three-second e.t. or the 400-mph barrier broken ever with the current cars and tracks so, with no significant barriers left to be broken, the drama that brought all those fans and sponsors appears to be on the wane. Despite claims to the contrary, the average number of fans attending races seems fairly stagnant compared to a decade ago and the TV numbers continue to be disappointing.

Drag racing's major leagues of NHRA and IHRA are for the most part considered to be minor league motorsports as far as the mainstream media is concerned. It's a sad fact but true. The mainstream media throws the drag racing fan a bone once in a while, but more often that not oval track racing -- any oval track racing -- pushes drag racing off the motorsports page. The respected magazine Autoweek dedicated its last two feature stories on drag racing to Nostalgia and Import racing. Sports Illustrated recently did a feature on bracket racing.

In my opinion, the reason for drag racing's second-class status is those in charge of the sport simply aren't doing a very good job of "selling" the sport of drag racing.

One reason for that might be that those currently in control of the sport simply have never had that seminal drag racing experience that hooked them on the sport and turned them into a true fan. They have a job working in the sport, but they'd be just as comfortable selling siding, pork bellies or NASCAR if the money were right.

Old geezers like myself really believe with a religious fervor that drag racing could and should be able to compete with NASCAR or any other motor sport at every level. I'm not sure the suits in charge of the major sanctioning bodies share the same belief. It's not that they don't give it their best shot, it's just that evidently their best shot isn't enough.

To me it's almost as if the people in charge have decided that drag racing fans really aren't coming to the drags for the unique, fast cars and side-by-side competition the sport can offer. Maybe that's why instead of more heads-up classes, they spend money booking exhibition classes, stunt cycles, fireworks, and clown acts to entertain fans.

I think one of the major reasons for the sport's inability to compete with NASCAR, IRL, CART et al. is we are doing a damn poor job of marketing our classes and drivers (John Force excepted). Also, for a variety of reasons, the Top Fuel and Funny Car classes have so little actual racing that many new fans are turned off. Despite the fact that for the last couple of years NHRA's Championship points chases were the closest in all of motorsports, most of the mainstream press, including the performance and racing car magazines, paid little or no attention. Someone just didn't or couldn't do their job.

I know that the sound, fury and performance of a nitro car still is the greatest visceral experience in professional motorsports, but in order to capture the imagination and hearts of the straight media (and more importantly their viewers and readers), they must watch them in person and on TV. Evidently not enough do.

Here are a few ideas I have -- some I have brought up before, some are new -- that might make NHRA and IHRA drag racing more attractive and important to the mainstream press.

Qualifying has become a joke and is not entertaining. When 17 cars are going for 16 spots there is not much drama involved. No wonder so many runs are aborted during nitro qualifying. They are testing for race day. Take a lesson from Pro Mod where 20-25 cars going for eight spots offer fans real drama. Every car and driver goes all-out on every pass. That's what qualifying is supposed to be. And on Sunday the fans know they are seeing the best the class has to offer.

Changing the nitro classes to eight-car fields would make qualifying important and entertaining again. Qualifying for an elite race is supposed to be a gut-wrenching backbreaking affair, not a walk in the park.

Make rule changes that put side-by-side racing back into the mix. Quit doing extreme track prep, reduce the wing area, reduce blower overdrive. That'll slow 'em down right now and probably cure a lot of the dreaded oil-downs.

While I'm on the subject, if NHRA and IHRA really wanted to stop oil- downs, they'd raise the fine to $10,000 and a hundred points. We would have damn few oil downs then.

Both NHRA and IHRA management seem bound to copy much of the management style of NASCAR. Why not follow their lead in controlling speeds and giving the fans and media a variety of tracks?

Arguably NASCAR's most popular races are run on short tracks at night. Why not try that with drag racing. I think one of the races at Chicago or Las Vegas or both could become eighth-mile races. "Short Track" drags could give a sport that is becoming dreadfully predictable some badly needed variety. Racing at night under the lights, nitro fumes and flames in front of a crowd that can see the start and finish from almost any seat. If that isn't great racing theater I don't know what is. It works for NASCAR, why not drag racing?

There is no doubt that the drag racing that C.J. Hart and his buds started back in 1950 have greatly improved in the last 50-plus years. Many of those improvements, such as insurance, safety, and better tracks, are to be lauded, but I believe it is time for some fundamental changes in drag racing.

The management teams at both the NHRA and IHRA seem to have no problems making rules that cost the racers from the professional categories and the sportsman ranks tons of money in misguided efforts to provide a "level playing field." But when it appears obvious to everyone except the palace guard that monumental changes are needed, apparently no one has the stomach to step up, take charge and change the status quo. Maybe they are just too busy counting the "Benjamins."

Previous Stories
Burk's Blast "the publisher's corner" — 6/29/04
We all forgot to put safety first

Cover | Table of Contents | DROstore | Classifieds | Archive | Contact
Copyright 1999-2003, Drag Racing Online and Racing Net Source