|
Our Mission |
DRAG
RACING Online will be
published monthly with new stories and features.
Some columns will be updated throughout the month.
DRAG RACING Online owes
allegiance to no sanctioning
body and will call 'em like
we see 'em. We strive for truth,
integrity, irreverence, and
the betterment of drag racing.
We have no agenda other than
providing the drag racing public
with unbiased information and
view points they can't get
in any other drag racing publication. |
Staff |
Editor/Publisher |
Jeff
Burk |
Editor
at Large |
Chris
Martin |
Managing
Editor |
Kay
Burk |
Senior
Editor |
Ian
Tocher |
Webmaster |
Matt
Schramel |
Asst.
Managing Editor |
Caitlin
Moriarity |
Bracket
Racing
Editor |
Jok
Nicholson |
Nostalgia
Editor |
Jeff
Utterback |
Contributing
Columnists |
Cole Coonce
Cliff Gromer
Darr
Hawthorne
Jeff Leonard
Pam
Utterback
Dave
Wallace
Dale
Wilson
|
Senior
Photographer |
Ron Lewis |
Contributing
Photographers |
Adam Cranmer
Tim Marshall
James Drew
Steve Gruenwald
Zak Hawthorne
Ivan Sansom |
Tech
Contributors |
Dave
Koehler
Darren
Mayer
Jay
Roeder
Jim
Salemi
Wayne
Scraba
Mike
Stewart |
European
Correspondent |
Ivan Sansom |
Poet Laureate |
Bob Fisher |
Director
of Advertising |
Darr
Hawthorne
818-906-8222
Fax:
818-990-7422 |
Accounts
Manager |
Casey
Araiza |
|
Website
Hosting |
|
Website & Ad
Design |
Matt
Schramel |
|
|
|
Win on Sunday, sell on Monday?
4/21/05
think that a case could be made that without the financial and technical
support of the big three Detroit auto makers, most drag racing sanctioning
bodies (and more specifically the NHRA) could not have survived,
much less thrived over the past 40 years or so.
I can remember back to the mid-60s when the titans of Detroit had
a very large commitment to NHRA doorslammer racing. From totally
factory backed Funny Car teams to Super Stock teams to the Factory
Experimental classes, those in charge at GM, Ford and Mopar made
a serious investment in terms of money, talent and resources in
the sport of Drag Racing, and the fact was they were much more involved
with drag racing than NASCAR at the time. I’m of the opinion
that Detroit believed their involvement in racing was justified
by the "Win on Sunday, sell on Monday" philosophy.
In those days you could go the drag races and watch your hero race
a car that actually could be ordered from the local car dealership
or in some cases bought race ready right off of the showroom floor.
Sadly, those days are long past, at least under the current racing
format of the major drag racing sanctioning bodies. The only exception
is the Mustang-based regional series. I doubt that very many fans
are influenced by an NHRA or IHRA Pro Stocker or Funny Car when
it comes to deciding what their next new car purchase will be.
Currently, GM, Chrysler and Ford all support NHRA professional
teams in either the Pro Stock or Funny Car division with some branding
in the form of company logos in Top Fuel, but I’d bet that
the big three’s actual investment is much less than it was,
say, 40 years ago if you compare 1965 dollars to 2005 dollars. I’m
thinking the Detroit companies who are still actively involved in
professional drag racing might be doing so from habit, hope and
as an engineering exercise.
The fact that GM lost 1.1 billion dollars in the first quarter
of 2005 and both Ford and Chrysler sales and profits have slumped
indicates that people just aren’t buying enough new cars.
(There are other factors related to labor that account for some
of GM’s woes, but if they sold enough cars it wouldn’t
be as big a factor.)
The only obvious involvement FoMoCo has in drag racing is supplying
John Force’s team with Mustang race car bodies that, unfortunately,
don’t resemble any Mustang I have ever seen. And when Ford
wanted to use drag racing to develop a new engine for production
cars, all the NHRA did was ban it. (Boy, you talk about pissing
on a sponsor’s shoes!)
Does anyone really believe that a 25-year-old in the stands at Phoenix
watched John Force win the Fuel Funny Car title, turned to his buddy
and said, "Let’s go down to the Ford dealer tomorrow.
I want to buy a Mustang like the one John Force drove when he won
Funny Car." When was the last time you saw a Ford Motor Company
print ad featuring John Force?
Now, I don’t want to imply here that there is no value in
a major car manufacturer being involved with drag racing major sanctioning
bodies. My friend Fred Simmonds, who’s in charge of the GM’s
drag racing program, has told me repeatedly that GM remains involved
with NHRA and to a lesser degree IHRA drag racing because they see
a benefit in the form of increased new car sales as a result.
However, I don’t see Ford or Chrysler putting new cars on
the Midway at every NHRA event like GM does, so I have to wonder
if those two companies just don’t think it is worth the effort.
Surely Ford isn’t selling all of the Mustangs they can build.
And you’d think Chrysler wouldn’t mind selling a few
more Stratuses (Strati?).
So, here is the point of this particular rant. It’s time
for NHRA and IHRA to do something positive for their Detroit marketing
partners. They need a showcase class for the actual cars that Detroit
is making. There is a striking resemblance between the automotive
scene of 1966 and that of 2005. Back in ’66, when the length
of my belt was less than the length of my pant’s leg, horsepower
was king. In my hometown of Amarillo, Texas, the Ford, Chevy and
Chrysler dealerships all had "house" Super Stock or A/FX
cars that competed every Sunday at Amarillo Dragway during the summer.
Guys like Fenner Tubbs in a Mopar, Jack Moss in a Galaxie 500XL
and Dickie Harrell in a Z-11 raced each other and the fans went
to the dealerships on Monday and bought a car like their hero’s.
I bought a 1963 Galaxie 500XL, four-speed with a 406 big block under
the hood.
The point is that back then, just as they are now, Detroit used
performance to sell cars and market their brands. Today you can’t
watch a car show on television, read a car mag or watch a commercial
about cars that doesn’t use horsepower as a sales tool. .
.from Mustangs and Dodge Magnums to the BMW and Mercedes Benz, performance
and horsepower are the driving force for sales. Virtually every
manufacturer has engine options that deliver close to 300 hp and
some even have powerplants that deliver 400 hp or more.
So, the questions on my mind are: Why haven’t the NHRA or
the IHRA marketing brass picked up on this? Maybe they just aren’t
car guys, I don’t know. Why aren’t the sanctioning bodies
taking advantage of the horsepower wars by developing a premier
class for all brand’s high performance cars?
And while they’re at it, they could finally come into the
21st century and bring both domestic and so-called foreign manufacturers
(most of whom have factories here in the good, old US of A) to the
party. A party where the 18- to 35-year-old car enthusiasts could
watch a hero driver racing his favorite brand of car against the
one he hates in cars that could actually be ordered from the dealer.
It would be the perfect opportunity for drag racing to get off their
jingoistic butts and allow all brands to compete against each other.
I’d pay to watch real factory hot rods with no wheelie bars
and flat hoods go at it, and I think most of the younger car-buying
fans would too.
You want to get the factories and their budgets really seriously
involved in drag racing like they are in NASCAR? Give them a venue
and a program with cars that they and their customers can really
relate to -- and I’m here to tell you that Pro Stock cars
with 500-inch big blocks, bubble hood scoops and carburetors under
the hood isn’t it.
If drag racing’s major sanctioning bodies don’t do
something to help Detroit justify their investment soon, those car
manufacturers' CFO’s -- who are trying to explain billion-dollar
deficits to shareholders who have no emotional attachment to the
sport and can’t see where it is positively affecting their
bottom line -- could end their involvement in drag racing.
|