Was this a weird year or WHAT?
I probably drove my editor crazy this month. My new "regular job"
and trying to get my ideas in order made me late getting this month's
"Dead-On" sent in. I figure if I get it sent in late maybe
Jeff will start paying me millions to write for him. O.K. maybe it will
just get me a raise? O.K. maybe it WON'T! Whatever, I like the forum
to be able to speak my mind and showcase ideas I get (steal) from other
racers. A lot of you have great ideas and if you think they are worth
getting out in front of millions and millions of readers (O.K. thousands
and thousands) send me an email and give me you thoughts on subjects
you feel are important. I also encourage you to send me an email if
there is a subject you want discussed or someone you want interviewed
to get the "Real Story."
This month I will make a short synopsis of how my first season in "Project
4-Link" went and what I noticed from my view of the sport.
We started out with almost no idea of what to expect from the dragster
and what would be involved in getting everything done. For a real close
look at the construction of the car you can go back and read each article
by clicking on the "archives" at the top of the main page.
Basically, the Dragstar Chassis performed perfectly, the Indy Cylinder
Head 540" was unbelievably consistent in cool and hot weather and
the racing in general went very well. We secured our first ever IHRA
Points Event win in Quick Rod, went a lot of rounds at the B&M Racer
Appreciation in Tri-State, won a local Super Comp race (huge field of
four cars!) and had no mechanical failures at all.
I have had a lot of emails wanting to know what performance level we
reached. My best eighth-mile run was 5.08 at 133.89. The best quarter-mile
run was 8.08 at 165.05. I never really pushed it hard. I never had the
start line chip over 4800 rpm and I shifted all year at 7000. With the
3.90:1 gear and 33.5 Hoosiers, the engine was turning a very conservative
6800-rpm at the finish line. I wanted this first season to be a lesson
for me on what to expect without making constant changes. Next year
I think "Project 4-Link" will be a 7.80 / 172 mph ride week
in and week out. Some of the changes we are making this winter are:
1. Barry Grant belt drive fuel pump and bypass.
2. Demon Carburetor's "King Demon Alcohol" carburetor installation.
3. Looser converter and possible change to 8-inch hard-hitting converter.
4. Change rear gear to 4.10 to free up the engine to rev quicker.
5. Slightly smaller rear tire to reduce the weight of the big tires.
6. Possible installation of the "all new" Indy Dominator intake
manifold.
Enough about "Project 4-Link". The other things I noticed
that were happening this year go like this:
1. The B&M Racer Appreciation tried a major expansion this year and
I think it backfired. In the Midwest the turnouts were very small and
in my opinion that will be the last we see of the B&M Series up north.
I thought they would work, but when it actually came to dish out the
$300 I noticed it was fifth round before you got any money back. That
is just not going to be accepted by racers up here. Third round losers
getting moneyŠI think they double the number of entries. Just the thoughts
of an old track owner and even older racer. I wish George Howard and
the B&M Series the best in the future. I think George's commitment to
the bracket racer is "second to none." He IS the only guy
who has stuck with us for so many years.
2. Speaking of George and the B&M Series. Why do we still call the
last race of the B&M Racer Appreciation Series "The Million Dollar
Race"? It requires about 500 entries to pay the million dollars
and the car count just isn't going to make it. Why not put a real name
on it such as "Mac Tools World Championships" (who do you
think uses more Mac Tools, the fuel racers or the thousands of bracket
racers who make their living as mechanics?)
3. I have noticed an idea that seems to be really working at certain
tracks in this area. Cedar Falls Raceway, Byron Dragway and Cordova
Raceway Park in particular have used this idea to increase payouts without
the normal raising of entry fees. What they have done is quite simple
and very well accepted by racers. The tracks set up one class, Super
Pro, and any racer who wants in the bracket enters, delay box or no
delay box. What they do is race the delay box cars against the delay
box cars and no-box cars against other no-box cars. When a winner has
been declared on each side of Super Pro bracket the two winners race
for the winner and runner-up money. I just love the idea as it gets
more cars into Super Pro and it eliminates the ongoing arguments about
why Super Pro is paid more than the Pro class.
4. Just to bring up another idea that is taking place around here I
want to mention the prize money we race for. On the weekends that are
called "Points Races" we pay $135 entry fee that covers both
days. Saturday pays $1,000 to win, $500 runner-up. Round money starts
with third round loser and stays steady at $30 per round on Saturday.
Sunday the winner earns $5,000, $2,000 for runner-up. Round money starts
third round and racers earn $50 per round from there on. I think the
track owners are onto something. We get car counts similar to the "good
old days" and this was just the first year of trying it. If your
track is struggling and the payouts just aren't there, you might mention
this at your banquet or racer meetings.
5. I wrote an article several months ago about multi-car teams. I am
seeing a rapid growth of this expensive phenomenon at almost every level
of racing. Is it good or bad? I have decided it is neither. If you can
afford it, great. If you can't afford it then get to work on your one
car and get out there and beat one of the team cars! It doesn't take
long to see the benefits of taking two cars to almost any type of race.
Towing expense per car is reduced, more "seat time" just makes
you better, and the "intimidation factor" is there. The one
trend you see more than ever is several semi-professional Super class
(S/Gas, S/Comp, Q/Rod, etc) racers getting their hands on a Stock Eliminator
car. Low maintenance, affordable costs and you can earn up to $18,000
with contingencies at an NHRA national event. The competition is good,
but it is not as exacting on the start line and finish line as Super
class races are getting. I have raced Stock at every level and I loved
it; the problem is there aren't many places to race them locally that
pay very well.
6. Since I just mentioned winning contingency money I have a thought
on that subject that hit close to home this summer. I won the IHRA HCS
Points race in Quick Rod in June and still have not COLLECTED all the
money some companies owe me. I have made dozens of calls, faxed letters
and even contacted IHRA about it. For a stinking hundred dollars you'd
think the companies would just pay. I did not try to collect for a product
I did not run and I had the decals. Where I messed up was the tech official
that looked over the car for decals and products did not see a few of
the decals under my down swept headers. I was having too much fun with
my friends going nuts over the win and did not notice he said I was
missing a few decals. I sent pictures of the car in the winner's circle
to these companies to prove I had the decals on but still no response.
That brings me to this simple question: Why does it matter if you even
have the decals if you run their product? You can't read them from the
bleachers; you can't see them in photographs. As long as their product
is on the car and you have dished out the cash to buy it they should
have to pay you for having the product. Sure, if you have the decals
put them on, but sometimes you can't find them. The manufacturer doesn't
want to send out thousands of decals and the sanctioning body sometimes
doesn't have enough to go around when you get to the event. Is it asking
too much for the companies to make payment within four weeks of the
event? I envy the organization guys like Peter Biondo, Dan Fletcher,
the Richardson brothers must have. They earn contingency awards at maybe
6 to 10 events per year and they have to keep all that organized to
make sure they get paid the correct amount for each event. I'll guarantee
you it is a complicated task. Why can't NHRA or IHRA inspect the car
for the parts and decals and just write out the check right on the spot?
I'll bet they could get paid in a matter of weeks, or that sponsor would
lose his sign and advertising exposure.
O.K. I'll chill out. It just bugs me that we bring our money to these
events, we pay them enough in entry fees to pay four times the purse
they do and yet winners get "dumped on" to hunt down the contingency
money on their own. To bad really, it could be a lot better.
I am through for this month and I hope you come back to our magazine
often. I am going to be updating "Project 4-Link" every few
weeks as we put on a belt drive fuel pump, convert to alcohol for fuel,
look into the latest weather gizmos and data acquisition systems. I
also will be doing a few more interviews in "Dead- On" and
I think you will get a kick out if some of the racers and those associated
with racing have to say.
Until then, be safe, be thankful for your family, your health and our
country and the brave young men out there chasing down the cowards that
attacked our country.
|
Fill out your Bracket
Report Card! |
Copyright 1999-2001, Drag Racing Online and Racing
Net Source
|