smalldrobanner.gif (3353 bytes)

Pomona Photos, Notes, and Quotes

Words by Dave Densmore, Chris Martin, and
Judy Stropus
Photos by Jeff Burk, Joel Gelfand, Don Gillespie, Tim Marshall, and
Jeff Romack


THE GAME’S THE SAME,
’THOUGH THE RULES HAVE CHANGED

Despite the Y2K uneasiness about the new NHRA rules changes, the Winternationals at Pomona were equal parts success and weirdness. By lowering the percentage of nitro for the fuel cars, oildowns were dramatically reduced, but the brainsplitting noise from these savages was also trimmed too. By about 10- to 15-percent, I’d say. The 75-minutes between pro rounds did not cause any mutinies, but fortunately and possibly because of the new nitro percentage rule, there was little in the way of nuclear blasts on track. The subsequent $500 fine for oildowns also produced no rebellions, and surprisingly didn’t spark a lot of ire from what I saw.

In terms of performance, the Top Fuel cars were off a tenth and down by about 3 to 4 mph. Funny Car was off by less than a tenth. In fact, Tony Pedregon’s 4.83 could build a strong case for the cars' not being off at all. However, the mile per hour was down noticeably with winner Jerry Toliver’s 313-mph off by about 7 to 8 mph. All in all, watching the nitro cars was like watching them through glass, still a great show, but something seemed to be missing ... at least for veteran racewatchers.

— Chris Martin

Let’s keep it moving, folks

Seventy-five minutes between rounds? How about 60? According to insiders, one hour is the target time for pro rounds although there doesn't seem to be a hard-and-fast date for implementation. Sixty minute rounds would mean four hour shows. That's great for television. But at what point is the show so compact that race fans feel like they aren't getting enough bang for their buck? Food for thought.

— Dave Densmore

 

Pomona pre-race predictions

A tour of the pits during qualifying produced a number of varied responses to the new rules. After Thursday’s solo pro session, Joe Amato’s 4.66 and John Force’s 4.95 led Top Fuel and Funny Car respectively with just nine Top Fuelers in the fours. Off of that session, a number of drivers, mechanics and manufacturers had opinions as to future performances and trends based on the rules changes. It’s a brow archer to look back at these remarks in light of what happened at Pomona.


Tim Richards (Chuck Etchells FC)

"There has been a definite loss of power and the cars won’t go as fast as they used to. It’s hard to say how much because we’re all learning a new tune-up and it’s not something that just falls into place. I think as the year goes on, you’ll see the cars pick up at the good tracks and in good conditions. If you can run 4.90s in a Funny Car this year, you’ll be competitive. Overall, I have no problem with the 90-percent rule, I think the more nitro you have the greater the destructive potential.

As for the 75-minute rule, I dunno. I’ll say this that if a team sustains chassis damage or burns a computer and the plumbing on a run ... well, they’re gone. They’ll need a huge crew to get back in the game."


Connie Kalitta (Top Fuel)

"Our team got hit with the first $500 fine (Doug Kalitta on Thursday), but I’m not mad at all. I had gotten a new dry sump and it malfunctioned and we got some oil down. 99-percent of the time if you’ve done your job, that stuff ain’t gonna happen. The car won’t have a problem. It’s when you start tweakin’ and twistin’ and messing with it that you blow out oil. We don’t need that stuff. Just use your head and tune your car. I can live with that rule and the other ones."
 

Kenny Bernstein (Top Fuel
)

"In our Arizona test sessions, we ran the 90-percent limit and I think what we experienced tells you a lot about how I feel on the new rules regarding nitro. We ran at both Tucson and Phoenix and used just two sets of heads. Normally on that many runs, we use up 10 or 12 sets of heads. The amount of internal damage was greatly reduced."
 

Nick Arias (Manufacturer
)

"If you’re running 90-percent nitro, you’ve got 10-percent extra alcohol. I think alcohol provides a better fuse and the fuel burns better. I think you’ll also see some of the unsponsored guys step up with the 90-percent rule. The reduced volatility in the fuel helps guys like Bobby Baldwin who has trouble with the big loads. He ran a 4.82 today, which will put him in the show. The racing will definitely be cleaner."
 

Bob Stange (Manufacturer)

"The new rules? Nuthin’ to panic about. Give the racers six months with the rules and things will be back where they were. You look at any type of racing when new rules are put in and what happens? The racers figure ‘em out and go faster. You can’t slow them down."
 

Dale Armstrong (WWF Funny Car)

"Whatever power we were makin’ in 1999, we’ll be making in two or three races. I’ll tell you how we’ll do it; high compression, more intake manifold pressure and boost the blower speed among other things. The 90-percent means you can squeeze the car harder. Methanol is like lead in gasoline, you get a higher octane. There’s a lot of smart guys out there and they’ll just find some way to circumvent the rule. The rule will prove to be only a momentary solution. These guys’ll be throwing bombs at each other soon enough, wait and see."

— CM

 


page 1 of 4

 

Copyright 1999-2001, Drag Racing Online and Racing Net Source