Baker: For me personally, it is the conditions related to how a difference of opinion concerning rule changes or procedures is addressed. As I'm sure you're aware, this can be a very confrontational job. We are, in effect, the policeman at the races. There are very few occurrences where someone will say, "You know, you did a good job there...."

Coming up with stipulations revolving around maintaining close competition in a variety of classes to provide a good show for the fans--while being productive for the track operator--is not always as easy as it seems. You have to ignore negative comments, as much as possible, and stay focused on the big picture.

DRO: WHAT'S THE TRICK TO KEEPING AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE HAPPY?

Baker: It is virtually impossible to satisfy everyone.

I treat it like the business that it is. I analyze how my approach to rule changes may affect our competitors, the sponsors, the manufacturers, and our track operators, as well as our events. So there is a tremendous amount of thought given to changes because the ramifications may be felt throughout the industry. I will say that--contrary to popular belief--any amendment we make is well thought out and based upon data and the general perception of what is best for all involved parties.

DRO: HOW MUCH CONSULTATION IS THERE WITH YOUR TECH OFFICIALS AND/OR RACERS BEFORE A RULE CHANGE IS MADE?

Baker: We base any change upon the level of competition. We analyze it from a variety of perspectives. The changes are made based upon the necessity to promote parity, or provide variety based upon the nature of the class.

A prime example is in Pro Modified. We adjust the competition standards to provide the best possible format for the various combinations to be competitive with each other based upon current conditions. Over the years, our changes have been very controversial and provided an avenue for tremendous amount of press for our competitors.

I feel that our past and present changes were and are warranted--based upon the analysis of competition results. The changes are necessary in order to preserve the class under the controversial format of two distinct engine combinations. I am optimistic that the 2002 rules that we have instituted will be effective for the entire season. I guess only time will tell.

DRO: WITH BOTH NHRA AND IHRA SANCTIONING SEVERAL SIMILAR CLASSES, DO YOU EVER CONSULT NHRA TECH OFFICIALS REGARDING RULE CHANGES?

Baker: Our departments communicate on a variety of issues. This is a facet that I have pursued over my years at IHRA. When I accepted the position at IHRA we basically had no communication with the tech department at NHRA. Today we share information based upon field conditions. I feel this is beneficial for us both as well as the competitors who compete in both organizations.

(next page)