<<
PREVIOUS PAGE
CHANGES NECESSARY
I wholeheartedly agree with (Jok's) article
on the changes to the Super class electronics
rules.
Just last September Don Davis finished my new
2002 Corvette roadster. Guess what? I have a
Mega 450 and a dual channel playback tach from
AutoMeter. The wiring job that Scott Anderson
did is truly a work of art and now I've had
to go in and mess with something that shouldn't
need to be touched! The extent of my changes
was not extreme. I unhooked the tach wire going
into the mega. Instead of adding a momentary
switch to trigger the recording function of
the playback tach I simply hooked the trigger
wire up to my 'bypass' button that I use to
back the car up without cycling all of the timers
in the box.
Even though the changes were not drastic I
am still mad as hell over this entire fiasco!
Like you, I do not believe that this will change
anything pertaining to alleged cheating. IF
the NHRA has proof of cheating and IF this rule
change ends the possibility of cheating then
the NHRA should tell the world exactly what
was going on! Then we could at least see the
reasons for the rule change.
I also find it interesting that the playback
tach function in the box is now illegal whereas
playback tachs and data recorders are still
just fine.
People who win often will always be scrutinized
by those who do not win often. Personally, I
have a hard time believing that the alleged
'high tech' cheating is really going on.
Bottom line for me though is that I have no
alternative. I've put all my eggs in the Super
Gas basket so I have no choice but to play by
their rules. I have expressed my feelings to
NHRA (with no reply of course), that's about
all I can do.
Good luck this coming season. I really enjoy
reading your column. Your subjects are insightful
and right on target. Your article on contingency
payouts was spot on! I have had companies in
the past either never pay or take up to a year
to finally pay.
Thanks for reading my ramblings!
John Steffen
BACK TO TECH SCHOOL
Jok, I couldn't have said it any better! I
run in Super Street in Div 6 and use a mega
400 box that took me months to pay for. I could
have stayed with my old equipment if I realized
these people were braindead. What's wrong with
surprise inspections or protests? I'm sure racers
would welcome that. Now I have to dig deep again.
Will it end? Educate the tech guys, don't make
us pay!
Steve Lowe
DOESN'T SOUND DERANGED TO
US
Loved (Burk's) latest editorial regarding factory
involvement. NHRA has their over-inflated heads
up their butts on many issues (living in California
I'll take your word on IHRA) and the "sanctity"
of their rule book is just one. They need to
shoot the paleontologist that keeps digging
up the prehistoric rules they're holding onto
for dear life in Pro Stock. I realize the racers
have a powerful voice but they are only interested
in what's best for them, not the sport.
Drop the min. weight of the cars, make them
run late model production based engines (i.e.
421" LS-6 with unlimited mods), and give them
EFI...maybe even turbos. I don't think performance
would suffer much, if any (especially if turbos
were allowed). And it would open the door to
getting "import" motors approved for competition,
thus involving the import manufacturers like
you've suggested.
Of course these are just the opinions of a
deranged Super Class racer... Keep up the good
work!
Greg Stanley
NEXT
PAGE >>
|