THAT'S 'TOTALLY' AWESOME
Just wanted to tell you that story about NHRA was AWSOME.
You hit it right on the head. I look forward to read more
of your stories. Keep up the good work.
Thanks.
Gary Jacobson
WRITE ON!
Jeff- Great editorial. I hope the powers that be are listening!
Bob Don
former writer SS&DI
NOT SO SPORTING
You know sometimes I agree with the editorial and sometimes
I don't. But as a sportsman racer, I've felt that NHRA
is getting more and more...ah..."ignorant" I
guess is the word, towards the sportsman racers and S/SS
in particular. But the last line, "NHRA has become
in 2004 where the bottom line is more important than the
finish line." summed it up exactly!
I guess I'm getting sick and tired of "suits" who
have no interest in racing, trying to squeeze every penny
out of guys and gals who love dragracing and couldn't stop
if they wanted to. My Mustang is parked for the winter
with a brand new, never-raced engine sitting in it...and
I'm building a Bronco to go mudbogging. Next season? I
don't know; if I can't stand not racing, I'll go to a local
IHRA track, but NHRA isn't getting my money anymore. I've
had enough and the editorial just clearly put into words
what I was thinking but trying to deny.
It's no different than some big corporate guy taking over
a company and running it into the ground while padding
his own pockets, and when the company folds, laughs and
retires a millionaire. He could have squashed a toothpaste
factory/retail store/drag racing association; he doesn't
care. And neither do the clowns in charge of the NHRA right
now.
Jim Miller
THE GOOD OLD DAYS
I have been involved with drag racing starting as a young,
easily influenced kid in early '60s, then becoming a competitor
in 1968. Jeff is right on the mark with the latest article.
What NHRA was then is nothing like what it is today. Back
then people like Dale Hamm, Div 4 director, Steve Gibbs,
and many others really gave a damn about racers, tracks,
programs etc. Now we have division directors that sleep
through divisional event qualifying sessions.
When I started going to races one of the biggest races
of the year was the "Texas vs California" meet
at Amarillo Dragway. I know it was all a booked in deal,
but you certainly couldn't convince the fans of that. There
was never a seat in the house. NHRA personnel were there
in force and it was a BIG DEAL. A race like this is not
possible today due to the cost of booking in a show. Can
you imagine the cost of booking in 8 top fuel and 8 nitro
funnys for 4-5 passes each. Granted this problem is not
the fault of NHRA directly, the sport just outgrew the
little tracks.
The current state of sportsman and bracket racing IS directly
the fault of NHRA. They could care less about sportsman
classes. If they did not need filler material to keep the
fans on site during the 75-minute turnaround time for the
pros there would be no sportsman racing. They "sanction" small
tracks around the country for bracket racing, but what
do these tracks get for the outrageous sanction fees? Do
any NHRA personnel show up for their races? Do they get
equipment, merchandise, or anything that would help put
people in the stands? Not hardly. They do get an outdated
old concept of "team bracket racing" with a "divisional
final race" at the end of the season. No new ideas,
no nothing.
A lot of the tracks have their own big money races that
draw a lot of cars, but few spectators. Yet the sportsman
and bracket racers are, as they always have been, the backbone
of the sport, the ones who really pay the bills. The latest
of which is to require a $60 membership to renew a required
permanent number. I personally use that number for 1 track
2-3 times a year and nothing else, yet it is required to
race there by NHRA rules. So in the great minds of the "suits" of
NHRA the attitude is to force us, the little guy to take
on even more of the bills while they ignore, insult, and
push us out the door. Hardly a good business plan, even
for a "for profit entertainment company".
On the other hand, look at the current IHRA sportsman
and bracket programs. The contingency is better. The prize
funds are better. There are a lot more races and options
for the "little guy". It is like IHRA took a
page out of the NHRA operations manual from about 20 years
ago and put it in play. Not that IHRA is perfect by any
means, but sportsman racers have a better future with IHRA
than NHRA.
You have heard the old saying about how Russia would take
the USA without firing a shot. Think about it. What a crying
shame Wally and his generation of NHRA people had to grow
old and retire. The current NHRA can't possibly be what
he dreamed of back in the fifties when this whole thing
started. NHRA has become the "cubic money organization." What
a shame this "cubic money" goes in ass pockets
instead of programs designed to bring new people into the
sport, improve track facilities, and make the experience
of attending a race a lot more pleasant for the PAYING
CUSTOMER!!!
Give me the good old days.
Jon Wolfe
Amarillo, Texas