1/20/05

CAN'T RELATE TO THE CARS

I have watched NHRA drag racing on TV religiously, for decades. I have been fortunate enough to attend three national events. I soak this stuff up like a sponge. But, I wonder just where the sport is going, with the rapidly rising cost of participating. The expenses involved in racing in the pro nitro categories have kept rising over the years. The most recent movement toward multiple car teams has just added even more to the cost. Privateers and single car teams don't have a chance in Hell of winning a national event without a miracle. At some NHRA events, there are few more cars qualifying than the 16 required to compete in eliminations. That isn't good for racing.

It doesn't do anyone any good to have a class where only the "elite" can compete. Eventually, fans will fade away because they will get tired of seeing the same competitors participating all the time. And young fans can't relate to the cars on the track. They don't resemble anything that we drive on the street. I'm afraid that eventually racers and fans will move on to the import classes that are less costly to buy, race and maintain. And everyday people can relate to those vehicles, as we drive those same cars to work and play. Back in the 70's, we could better relate to the cars on the dragstrip, as they were gradually morphing from street muscle cars to racing cars.

But now, the only class of cars in the pro categories that even remotely resemble our street cars are in the Pro Stock class. Maybe the NHRA needs to gradually move toward incorporating some of the import and stock classes into the pro ranks? But I suppose, the cycle would start all over again with those classes too. Before you know it, some race team would be running 5 Volkswagen Beetles and the guy from Joe's Auto Parts couldn't afford to compete any more with his lowly one-car team.

I love to watch the nitro cars and wouldn't want to see the classes go away. There is nothing like it in the world. But, for the continuing good health of NHRA overall, it may be time to re-group and think about the future before it's too late!

Dave Smithers

JUST WONDERING. . .

Why the NHRA doesn't loosen the rules in Top Fuel to let creative minds
bring some new and unique-looking cars to the starting line like Jim Head and Don Garlits used to do. Also, let's see some more variety in Pro Stock. They could take a lesson from Pro Mod and blown fuel altereds. Television would be much more exciting to the "regular viewer."

Mark Case

HOOKED ON A FEELING

I've been a huge follower of nitro drag racing for almost all of my 51 years. It's always been about breaking ET and speed records as much as beating the guy in the other lane. I live for those few days every year when I can actually stand right next to a cackling nitro motor just waiting to feel the blast and have every part of me shake! It's like being 5 years old on Christmas morning! I know that the NHRA has the responsibility of driver and fan safety. They also have the responsibility of not turning the sport into one big IROC event. Close racing is great stuff but so are breaking records and barriers. They won't keep the stands full for long if they force the nitro cars to go bracket racing. The 85% rule is crap and don't tell me that you can't tell any difference from 100%. My nose needs heavy, choking, thick, yellow clouds of fumes at idle. I miss the pain of a 100% rap. I want the drivers and fans to be safe but please don't neuter these machines. I want to be thrilled to goosebumps, not bored to tears!

Mike Bowers
Ft. Wayne, IN.

DRO GETS A GOLD STAR

All parties concerned:
Just a quick note to say I really enjoy your web site. It's informative and up-to-date. The articles are great and express an interesting point of view. Keep up the good work.

G Man Smith
415G SG
West Point, MS







 

Copyright 1999-2004, Drag Racing Online and Racing Net Source