SIMPLE AS A, B, C
In response to your 8.90, 9.90, 10.90 index classes and
how or what can we do, let us take a piece from the Goodguys
VRA and bring back A/Gas B/Gas and C/Gas indexed at 7.85,
8.85, and 9.85, and rid ourselves of the autopilot-like
electronics which are killing our sport.
Who wants to watch two cars launch hard, stop, launch again,
watch their heads look around at the top and then mash the
brakes? Is it SAFE? No. I have seen many crashes under this
configuration and I vote to bring REAL heads up racing back,
allow the tuners and drivers to go at it with their brains
instead of an electronic device that not only allows you
to bump to get a better reaction time, but tells you what
you are going to run.
This sport is not supposed to be a video game but instead
a sport that encourages BRAINS, BRAWN, and LUCK! The questions
arise about the cost of sportsman racing -- lose the computers,
they are for e-mailing, finding a girlfriend and looking
up Drag Racing Online!
Ken Becker
Purple Buffalo Racing
CHANGE THE INDEX!
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
I couldn't agree with you more about changing the indexes
for Super Comp, Super Gas and Super Street. Most of the
cars in those three classes can easily run well under their
current indexes; the few that are stretched to go that fast
would have an incentive to find more horsepower (or use
less throttle stop). The car counts would drop slightly
but only for a short period. Look at the caliber of the
cars that compete in those classes, 540 inch and bigger
big block Chevys in 2100 pound tube frame; four link race
cars in Super Gas, 556 and bigger engines in 1900 pound
dragsters.
Super Gas was initially run at the 1978 Winternationals
on a 9.80 index shortly after that NHRA raised the index
to 9.90, that was 27 years ago! The cars that competed then
were a world different from the ones we see today. Changing
the indexes would help "liven up" the classes,
throttle stops would be used at a minimum and these classes
would be fun again. I like the idea of door cars running
8.90, evidently so did Greg Venture; Greg won the largest
NHRA Super Comp race in history at Las Vegas this year...in
a 1966 Nova.
Bob Mendenhall
Lakeside, CA
TAKE ELECTRONICS OUT
As a former Super Gas racer in NHRA Div 2, I can honestly
say that the current state of the Super Classes is sad.
You are correct in saying the average fan cannot relate
to a 7-second dragster dialed in and running 8.90. When
I started in Super Gas, I was fairly competitive with a
2x3 frame mild steel chassis, 30 over 454/glide combo. The
car ran 9.50 wide open and used a manual stop on the carb
to slow it down. Like most little guys, I can't afford an
$80,000 chassis, $30,000 engine and $6,000 trans. I got
out because of the spiraling cost to stay competitive.
NHRA needs to take a long hard look at these classes and
get back to where guys like myself can participate and where
fans can see some exciting "heads up" racing.
The biggest culprit, in my opinion is electronics. It has
taken the human element out of the sport. I hope someday
it will change, but I am not very optimistic.
Anyway, keep up the great work.
Jerry LoBiondo
NHRA 2037